Important Disclaimers:

*This website is attorney advertising material and the information on this website is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.  Information discussed when simply contacting the Immigration Attorney alone may not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.

*The Supreme Court of Illinois does not recognize certifications of specialties in the practice of law and no specific certificate, award or recognition is required to practice law in Illinois. 

*The information contained on this website is for general purposes only and should not be interpreted to indicate that a certain result will occur in your specific legal situation. 

*Immigration Attorney Rebecca Carcagno primarily works from her home office in Ann Arbor, Michigan and does not have multiple offices.

*The Law Offices of Rebecca Carcagno, PLLC is not associated with any attorney or law firm at 3830 Packard St, Suite 240, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 or at any other location. 

*Immigration Attorney Rebecca Carcagno is responsible for this website's content and can be contacted through the contact information provided on the menu and contact webpages of this website.

Reclamos Importantes:

*Esta página es materia de anuncio de abogado y la información contenida en este sitio web no es consejo legal y no crea una relación de abogado-cliente.  Es posible que la información discutida durante la consult gratis con la Abogado no sea protegida por el privilegio abogado-cliente. 
*El Supreme Court of Illinois no reconoce certificaciones de especialidades en la práctica de la ley y no se requiere ninguna certificación específica, premio, o reconocimiento para practicar leyes en Illinois.  
*La información contenida en esta página es para propósitos generales y no debe ser interpretada para indicar que su situación legal vaya a tener un cierto resultado.   
*La Abogado Rebecca Carcagno principalmente trabaja desde su oficina en casa y no tiene múltiples oficinas.   
*The Law Offices of Rebecca Carcagno, PLLC no está relacionado con ningún abogado o firma en 3830 Packard St, Suite 240, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 o en otra dirreción.
*La Abogado Rebecca Carcagno es responsable del contenido de este sitio web y le puede contactar mediante la información de contacto en la página del menú y la página de información de contacto. 

Residual Clause of "Crime of Violence" under "Aggravated Felony" Voided for Vagueness is a WIN for immigrants' rights

It was decided today in the reargued case of Sessions v. Dimaya that the residual clause defining "a crime of violence" where there is a penalty of imprisonment of at least one year (18 USC 16(b)) under an "aggravated felony" (INA 1101(a)(43)(F)) is unconstitutional as it violates the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment and should be voided for vagueness.  In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court (Majority) compared the residual clause in question to the residual clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) under 18 USC 924(e) and determined that the clauses share the two important characteristics regarding the vagueness of the "ordinary case" and the threshold for a crime to be considered a "violent felony"; the Justices reasoned that the residual clause of 16(b) should not be treated any differently than the struck down residual clause of the ACCA despite it being only a civil matter (rather than a criminal matter) because there is precedent for the void for vagueness doctrine to be applied in non-criminal cases and that such non-criminal matters involve cases where the consequence is deportation- a very severe consequence.

 

This decision should be viewed as a WIN for immigrants' rights as the void for vagueness doctrine has as its purpose for the ordinary person to have "fair notice" of the conduct that the statute proscribes- in turn helping to avoid any arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement of the statute through providing some form of governing standards.

 

 

***Please keep in mind that this blog posting is for educational purposes only (i.e., to give you general information and a general understanding of this immigration related matter); this blog posting does not provide specific legal advice and does not form an attorney-client relationship.***  

 

 

Sources: 

 

1. https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/17/politics/supreme-court-federal-law-deportation-immigrants/index.html

 

2. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/15-1498_1b8e.pdf

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Featured Posts

Citizenship Test Changes

July 25, 2019

1/10
Please reload

Related Posts
Please reload

Follow The Law Offices of Rebecca Carcagno, PLLC on Twitter!
  • Facebook Social Icon
  • Twitter Social Icon